Getting the computer to fit a linear model is relatively straightforward. Spending the time and making sure what you plan to do is meaningful with respect to the measurements you have used, making your model estimates (coefficients) interpretable to help you understand the model output, and determining the best measures of effect to make your results comparable within your model, and to other estimates in the scientific literature is a key part of this.
In some sense the whole week is to get you to focus on the question “What is the difference?” (or “what are the differences?”), and to make sure the differences (and their associated uncertainties) are meaningful, interpretable and comparable. This is generally much better than asking questions like “Is there a difference?” (“are there differences?”). These latter questions are often much less useful, and more likely to result in bad habits in terms of data modeling, statistical inference and using these to answer biological questions.
Making estimates meaningful: What you measure, and how it impacts how you model data, and derive meaning from model estimates.
Making estimates interpretable: How simple “transformations” like mean-centring and standardization (z-transformation) predictor variables can aid in interpretation.
Making estimates comparable: How to make your model estimates (coefficients) both within your experiment, and (hopefully) to enable meaningful comparisons with the broader literature.
